Reading  Summary 11:  Risk and Crisis Communication
    
Jeff Neal
    
Reference:  Ferrante, Pamela; Risk & Crisis Communication, Essential Skills for today's  SH&E professional; Public Safety, Print Journal Held; Jun2010, Vol. 55  Issue 6, p38-45. 8p
    
Theme: Risk and  Crisis communication involve methods of how to communicate to the public and  stakeholders information related to an emergency event.
    
Summary: The difference  between risk and crisis communication is that risk communication occurs prior  to an emergency event.  It is the ongoing  process that helps to define a problem and notify stakeholder of the need for  action and outline their involvement.   Crisis communication includes the messages that are delivered to  stakeholders that are threated during the actual emergency.  Crisis communication purpose is to deliver  the information to the public to prevent, avoid, or recover from an emergency.
    
When delivering the messages to the public it's important to  understand how this information is processed by the public.  There are four theoretical models that  outline how information is processed;
    
Risk perception Model: This model theorizes that public  perception related to risk comes from 15 different factors.  The effect of each factor depends on the  stakeholder involve, but understanding these factor help with understanding how  people react to risk and crisis.  These  15 factors include: Volunteerism, controllability, familiarity, equity, benefits,  understanding, certainty, dread, trust in institutions, reversibility, personal  stake, and ethical / moral nature, human vs. natural origin, victim identity, and  catastrophic potential.
    
Mental Notice Model: This model determines how the pubic  process information under stress and anxiety. As the level of stress raises the  individual's ability to process information decreases.  If emergency personnel are trying to deliver  information during a disaster much of the message will be lost due to the public's  inability to process the information.
    
Negative Dominance Model: During an event negative information  will be received at a much high rate than positive information.  People are more concerned with what they will  lose then any possible gains.  
    
Trust Determination Model:  The public must have trust, and trust comes  first in all messages.  Without trust  much of the message will be lost.  Trust  in not obtained quickly, for this reason emergency personnel must establish  trust prior to the event.  If the public  trust the communicator the message will be heard.
    
Application to the lesson: Many time emergency managers spend much  of their time preparing the message that will be delivered, but spend little  time preparing the public to receive the message.  Hey believe because the  message is so important and well prepared that everyone will listen to it when  they speak, like an EF Hutton commercial.   It takes time to build the trust and evaluate the stakeholder's needs in  our communities so that the message will be receive.    
    
Application to  emergency services: part of the emergency response plan for a major  disaster if communications are down in Salt Lake city is to have fire personnel  report to specific stations following a disaster and then systematically drive  though the area looking for emergencies.   Much of the public is not aware of this.   They believe they can still call 911 in the event of an earthquake and  that help will be on its way.  This  message needs to be delivered prior to an event so that the public will be prepared  to wait for assistance from emergency service personnel.  
    
I think that you can have risk communication during the event if it is forecasting further problems. Does warning people of aftershocks following an earthquake fall under risk communication or crisis communication?
ReplyDelete