Reference: Valvi, A. C., & Fragkos, K. C. (2013). Crisis communication strategies: a case of British Petroleum. Industrial & Commercial Training, 45(7), 383-391. doi:10.1108/ICT-04-2013-0026
Theme: With an oil spill in 2010 BP failed in it's communication during the crisis.
Summary:
- British Petroleum (BP) came face to face with a crisis on 20 April 2010 when an explosion in the Deepwater Horizon oil drilling rig caused a huge oil spillage in the Gulf of Mexico.
- The case study attempts to describe BP's serious communication mistakes managing a serious hit to BP's reputation.
- The case study attempts to provide a detailed outline of BP's communication failures by conducting in-depth investigation of newspapers, audiovisual material, social network sites.
- BP's crisis communication was a weak link in its crisis management strategy.
- Public Relations (PR) mistakes were made by BP and shouldn't be avoided in a crisis of their organization. They should select strategies that point out their organization's strengths and correct its weaknesses in order to take advantage of opportunities and counter external threats.
- This study could be valuable in communication, since BP's PR strategies during this oil spill have not been studied before this incident, now they have and suggestions have been made
- The communications solutions BP took during the crisis were examined and certain strategies BP should have followed in order to avoid its failed PR plan are outlined in the article.
- The suggestions can help both PIO's and researchers to learn from BP's mistakes and give more attention to communication strategies, which are critical to all crises.
Application to lesson topic: Good crisis communication is vital in any situation
Application to emergency management: In an emergency good crisis communication is vital. That is how information is passed onto the public. When crisis communication doesn't go well, there's enormous consequences.
This was a huge crisis back in 2010. The failed communication truly increased the damages that resulted from the explosion. In a case like this, there are so many factors at stake. You have environmental and economic considerations. For one, the financial resources that were lost in the spill and in trying to repair the spill were huge. The environmental damage was also big. This affected things like seafood industry, as well as the tourist industry. If there had been better communication, mitigation would have minimized the damage, but because they were unprepared and failed to communicate, the damages were even worse.
ReplyDelete