- · It's necessary to combine psychological and sociological approaches to help in explaining
- · Some incidents produce more visceral responses than other, depending on what the circumstances of the event are.
- · The message really only felt important to people in which dealt directly with the risk, and therefore the information did not gain traction to a wide audience.
- · While the event itself did not draw a lot of media attention, professionals in the field developed a heightened interest. This came to fruition based on future studies and publications rather than media coverage.
- · Local media coverage had some penetration that left knowledge of the event in the minds of people, but the national media hardly covered the story at all.
- · Media coverage was fair. There was no embellishment of the events and the outlets stuck very close to the actual press releases.
- · The crisis communications that followed the event included adding signs that there were hazards in the area associated with animals. This increased the communities understanding of the risk.
j_elliotte@yahoo.com
360 609-2839